It tends to use lots of memory and the subversion plugin tends to lock the workspace for too long when it does the refresh on big projects.
TEAMVIEWER 12 SLOW WINDOWS
Windows scrolling and GUI interactions are much better than ST. Eclipse: I’m currently heavely using Eclipse (with Emacs Key map).emacs, vi, nedit, … Emacs is still my low end prefered editor whenever I can’t find a higher end editor.ST is definitly not good with NoMachine, unless the remote server is just next door on your local network. Given that this kind of thread is not new and given that the answer is always about “why would you work this way”, it does not seem Sublme Text is going to be for these comapnanies any time soon. Sublme Text is a nice tool, but not for these companies, not for working with these people, not for working on these kind of remote servers. (BTW, very expensive tools on the remote server it the main one). Some are just customers and they just have good reasons of doing so. The point is, there are companies out there that just work this way. Still, some companies are really secured in working this way (no copy paste, no uuencode available either, no way to get files out except taking pictures with your mobile, hard to get to 100k-loc out). I tend to believe my laptop is betterly secured than most of these accesses. No offence, this may be true.Ī remote desktop may not be as secure as someone/geek’s laptop. I see here people are just better than anyone big companies. Haha ! Always the same story, I’m glad to hear it again ! I’ve done plenty of remote editing over SFTP on Linux servers, but almost zero remote desktop with a GUI editor running on the remote side.
At least, the vast majority of the servers I’ve worked with in my career. Most? I’d venture to say that most Linux servers probably don’t even have a UI environment. Having an editor that work on that use case is a must for most of people working on Linux servers. More tedious than a remote desktop connection? The download/upload process is just too tedious That’s where editing via remote mounts come into play (e.g. I don’t want to commit things just to find out it does not compile. Tools are on the server and need the files. I understand you might not have control over it, but given how easy it is to transfer data over remote desktop protocols (hint: most of them actually enable copy/paste between local and remote buffers!), there’s simply no validity to this type of restriction. My laptop is better secured than most data centers, from a realistic threat vector standpoint.Ĭompanies/customers may block any access except a remote desktop, ensuring not data cannot be transfered out of their network Companies/customers don’t want files to be on laptops in non secured placesĪ generally valid concern, though full-disk encryption resolves this pretty nicely.
0 kommentar(er)
